WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0!
From: Daniel Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:45:14 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:46:44 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4F737BC.1D534%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Perhaps the cset numbers refer to 3.3-testing, not xen-unstable?
-----Original Message-----
From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:40 PM
To: Stefan Berger
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Error while running the xm test suite: Cannot handle page request order 0!

On 17/9/08 22:23, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I suspect a memory leak in your particular configuration. It’d be
> good to try to narrow down which changeset or range of changesets
> introduced the problem.


I narrowed it down as far as : 18411 fails and 18407 works, which is very strange since I don't see any critical changes in between...

Yes. 18411 affects only ia64. 18410 affects only internal ioemu (not used by default build). 18409 reverts 18408, and simply adds a wrapper around ‘install’ inside the tools/ directory. Weird!

 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel