|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] microcode update support for AMD CPUs
Christoph Egger writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] microcode update support for AMD
CPUs"):
> + edx = (unsigned int)((unsigned long)(addr >> 32));
This is wrong. addr is an unsigned long, ie 32 bits so you are
shifting by >= the word size, which is not permitted. Helpfully, many
compilers warn about it.
But addr came from this:
addr = (unsigned long)&uci->mc.mc_amd->hdr.data_code;
surely this cannot be right if you're expecting the address to be
longer than 32 bits in some cases ?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|