WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] HVM kernbench performance on Linux (2.6.27-rc4 vs. 2.6.18.6-

To: "xen-devel mailing list" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] HVM kernbench performance on Linux (2.6.27-rc4 vs. 2.6.18.6-amd64)
From: "Todd Deshane" <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:11:32 -0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:11:54 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=6puH/WZm7eneLIyGO68KouHWZXlNUeT1Xat7RkE2f0A=; b=CXGStnmdLsvuF9J+1X1DMAC8Wnvx4tlEMxkRTEfaSxUatgyPC6arnmbPB6Ixp5RiAC y4fWoH0CHfGk7EG34u9YdT72xMoBInjCcu67meGbO/vNXnKbWzWRGYJfyjja2ovvEXo9 8FrR1jbv8aNyhFtLlwT8mSphpcqEg6luYWbeg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jYNiR91Xc+mmxrA4Duunt2Xi8Bz905yZQlfsOl721OcjcgLBbXPc4J10ENexh6vZeU bd0srUGbpvqsvl+wlQprkXeOIrEDG8MnPg9noxPCDDiiWLtX0hxcRE2q5AIwMF5INRow qxLZugOnqrcFw1H16CJRhCBxoLy8qrXHHSX4k=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi All,

Starting a new thread to narrow down the problem.

So it seems the problem doesn't occur for me on Debian 4.0 HVM guest,
as suggested by Gianluca Guida.

The Debian 4.0 vanilla install has a  2.6.18.6-amd64 kernel.

The results are below. So it seems that the guest kernel makes a big difference.

The performance problem is not seen on the debian kernel.

HVM guest (Debian 4.0 vanilla 2.6.18.6-amd64)

shadow2
2.6.18.6-amd64 guest kernel
Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 506.658 (4.13104)
User Time 364.536 (0.337757)
System Time 140.834 (4.04617)
Percent CPU 99 (0)
Context Switches 29803 (120.69)
Sleeps 37929.2 (355.421)

shadow3
2.6.18.6-amd64 guest kernel
Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 489.58 (4.00024)
User Time 389.328 (0.614304)
System Time 98.838 (4.86796)
Percent CPU 99 (0)
Context Switches 29314.6 (196.596)
Sleeps 37773.6 (231.069)

vs. the same machine and guest config with a 2.6.27-rc4 guest kernel


shadow2
2.6.27-rc4 guest kernel
Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 737.144 (5.19414)
User Time 498.508 (2.52895)
System Time 235.056 (2.71348)
Percent CPU 99 (0)
Context Switches 133127 (823.517)
Sleeps 36295.4 (124.088)


shadow 3
2.6.27-rc4 guest kernel
Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 2081.71 (34.0459)
User Time 617.36 (3.61771)
System Time 1430.36 (28.3309)
Percent CPU 98 (0)
Context Switches 331843 (5283.28)
Sleeps 37329.8 (91.538)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>