 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
| To: | "xen-devel mailing list" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench) |
| From: | "Todd Deshane" <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:22:32 -0400 |
| Cc: | Muli Ben-Yehuda <MULI@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:22:53 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=6J6fLh7DE/cP+cxCzV2wsH9MytRV1XX6pB/b/cyassU=; b=qrlwYexOqMmadZxEGNo6ebxi5iMw6/60aUShIcHFFOQ9xoOle7VLZaZaAV+IySLRkU OVJoo/apjrKMvr5TGg7R3UMkKINIRzM5vRnZig/IHxlhE58kuL7bEC2pDhPMfNvKtKeT Qca0wmF1TeJAHWorl0/LPhyqLZSUtTqPtZA9A= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=tN7tb+z+VdxaLmJt7Hame/Y1ZXL0b5t/RqJcqTcOh04eGupGWnDpQJOXUb5qneU1H+ Q3jxJxUjvseIMIme2E3Nki/50ttJlhMAZte4aWTAXHa0M2W7kkGSCFj9p3WigPJp8jac QWwE1v/NFRcqnQ3Sm1Uo6q596x7IqlQyVXu1o= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1e16a9ed0809101123m71a12030v7d06501f6467f93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <1e16a9ed0809101123m71a12030v7d06501f6467f93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | deshantm@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
As an update, Xen HVM on Xen 3.2 on Ubuntu 8.04 from packages: Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation): Elapsed Time 954.4 (4.95457) User Time 441.744 (2.56251) System Time 506.018 (7.45156) Percent CPU 99 (0) Context Switches 160222 (1113.68) Sleeps 37604.8 (182.796) This is actually more what would be expected of Xen 3.2 right? Xen 3.3 should be an improvement with shadow3 right? Should I need to adjust the shadow_memory parameter for the guest? I'm going to try Xen 3.2.1 from source next. Todd _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] VT-d issue on Xen 3.3.0 [WAS: Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S ABUGOR...)], Nadolski, Ed |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] [Fwd: Xen 3.4 feature request (security)], Ian Pratt |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Todd Deshane |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Anthony Liguori |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
