WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Question about the Xen Scheduler

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Question about the Xen Scheduler
From: "Girish V" <girish.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:34:12 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:34:37 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=j36ikE++Gh+37MZu22p+Jy3jzbAqxhRu16+6Ex+V2l0=; b=AF+zQlmx4LoXJeYph5NKMvNawaqVDuON4/ExRHv6xPo8bz7CIcG11isk4skqZMW5Wd XLF8YyIzeVHz8bLUlZ2b/JEe43UMNKzg1pv/abgCoPCq565Ne9JUP7nA4GwI4HBYSj8p N5A3VB7018E0FHRxUsJMoek3iV/MkDfhxtinw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xkSG/7b1coYFKmdpZ++HnNCPslMIVMFC5RpEXuoGHN2V2qISmXEvN85pE7s5Zh8lK4 6WZNsU6pqsRRIfBVELyhZ3NNOMFf/L2V3R6yYxP8P5GowhajgXio5iT/Iy9f4QDeLqY+ ZDrFMQMF7F7rcKRPpSK0JsSVDh8sXyNap3tGY=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4E34E69.1CB07%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <2122f0920809021032s142b4daelf9921bf308d7c2f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C4E34E69.1CB07%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2/9/08 18:32, "Girish V" <girish.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to understand the behavior of the Xen scheduler. I am
>> using Xen 3.0.2 on a 1 CPU machine and I have the default scheduler
>> (which I believe is the credit scheduler - and I have not explicitly
>> set any weights/caps for the domains).
>
> The credit scheduler was introduced in 3.0.3, so you are using the old SEDF
> scheduler. I'd recommend you upgrade your Xen version.
>

Thanks for pointing that out. Still I am not sure I understand the
behavior I see. Should I set any parameters to ensure that both the
dom0 and user domain are scheduled when both are executing cpu
intensive workloads?

>  -- Keir
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>