 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about the Xen Scheduler
| To: | "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Question about the Xen Scheduler |
| From: | "Girish V" <girish.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:34:12 -0400 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:34:37 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=j36ikE++Gh+37MZu22p+Jy3jzbAqxhRu16+6Ex+V2l0=; b=AF+zQlmx4LoXJeYph5NKMvNawaqVDuON4/ExRHv6xPo8bz7CIcG11isk4skqZMW5Wd XLF8YyIzeVHz8bLUlZ2b/JEe43UMNKzg1pv/abgCoPCq565Ne9JUP7nA4GwI4HBYSj8p N5A3VB7018E0FHRxUsJMoek3iV/MkDfhxtinw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xkSG/7b1coYFKmdpZ++HnNCPslMIVMFC5RpEXuoGHN2V2qISmXEvN85pE7s5Zh8lK4 6WZNsU6pqsRRIfBVELyhZ3NNOMFf/L2V3R6yYxP8P5GowhajgXio5iT/Iy9f4QDeLqY+ ZDrFMQMF7F7rcKRPpSK0JsSVDh8sXyNap3tGY= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C4E34E69.1CB07%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <2122f0920809021032s142b4daelf9921bf308d7c2f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C4E34E69.1CB07%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/9/08 18:32, "Girish V" <girish.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I am trying to understand the behavior of the Xen scheduler. I am >> using Xen 3.0.2 on a 1 CPU machine and I have the default scheduler >> (which I believe is the credit scheduler - and I have not explicitly >> set any weights/caps for the domains). > > The credit scheduler was introduced in 3.0.3, so you are using the old SEDF > scheduler. I'd recommend you upgrade your Xen version. > Thanks for pointing that out. Still I am not sure I understand the behavior I see. Should I set any parameters to ensure that both the dom0 and user domain are scheduled when both are executing cpu intensive workloads? > -- Keir > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Question about the Xen Scheduler, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [xend] move the call to XendDevices.destroy_device_state(), Stefan Berger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Question about the Xen Scheduler, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: Question about the Xen Scheduler, Girish V |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
