WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27-rc1 crashing under Xen 3.1.2, 3.1.3

To: Carl Jones <carl.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27-rc1 crashing under Xen 3.1.2, 3.1.3
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:30:42 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:31:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <df5598920808041856h494c6597vc3f3f617f4800e2b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <df5598920808041856h494c6597vc3f3f617f4800e2b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723)
Carl Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing 2.6.27-rc1 and it appears to crash when booting under
> 3.1.2 and 3.1.3.
>
> Host is 2x Xeon 5410/32GB, 3.1.2 on x86_64 (from source).
>
> I see the same issue using 2.6.26. The same kernel will boot fine
> under 3.2.x, and 3.1.4 (just not 3.1.2 or 3.1.3). Older kernels e.g.
> 2.6.24 boot fine.
>
> domU has 256MB memory, 1 VCPU.
>
> dmesg output is below.
> Kernel config: http://radium.outervoid.net/~carl/2.6.27-rc1
>
> Regards,
> Carl
>
> Reserving virtual address space above 0xf57fe000
> Linux version 2.6.27-rc1-xenU (root@x) (gcc version 4.1.2 20071124
> (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)) #4 SMP Mon Aug 4 20:52:48 EDT 2008
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:469 early_ioremap_init+0x126/0x210()
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc1-xenU #4
>  [<c012365a>] warn_on_slowpath+0x5a/0xa0
>  [<c0103a94>] xen_mc_flush+0xc4/0x190
>  [<c0104b02>] xen_set_pmd_hyper+0x72/0x90
>  [<c03095c6>] early_ioremap_init+0x126/0x210
>  [<c02ffc99>] setup_arch+0x29/0x5d0
>  [<c02fbb41>] start_kernel+0x61/0x2a0
>  [<c02ff16a>] xen_start_kernel+0x58a/0x650
>  =======================
> ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
> pmd c033cd50 != c033cd58
> fix_to_virt(FIX_BTMAP_BEGIN): f55fe000
> fix_to_virt(FIX_BTMAP_END):   f56fd000
> FIX_BTMAP_END:       256
> FIX_BTMAP_BEGIN:     511
> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
>  Xen: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable)
>  Xen: 00000000000a0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
>  Xen: 0000000000100000 - 0000000000366000 (usable)
>  Xen: 0000000000366000 - 00000000003a9000 (reserved)
>  Xen: 00000000003a9000 - 0000000010000000 (usable)
> last_pfn = 0x10000 max_arch_pfn = 0x1000000
> NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
> DMI not present or invalid.
> 0MB HIGHMEM available.
> 256MB LOWMEM available.
>   mapped low ram: 0 - 10000000
>   low ram: 00000000 - 10000000
>   bootmap 00002000 - 00004000
> (7 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 0010000000]
>   #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000]   BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000]
>   #1 [0000001000 - 0000002000]    EX TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000001000 - 0000002000]
>   #2 [0000006000 - 0000007000]       TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000007000]
>   #3 [0000100000 - 00003656f0]    TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0000100000 - 00003656f0]
>   #4 [00003a9000 - 00003af000]    INIT_PG_TABLE ==> [00003a9000 - 00003af000]
>   #5 [0000007000 - 0000081000]          PGTABLE ==> [0000007000 - 0000081000]
>   #6 [0000002000 - 0000004000]          BOOTMAP ==> [0000002000 - 0000004000]
> Zone PFN ranges:
>   DMA      0x00000000 -> 0x00001000
>   Normal   0x00001000 -> 0x00010000
>   HighMem  0x00010000 -> 0x00010000
> Movable zone start PFN for each node
> early_node_map[3] active PFN ranges
>     0: 0x00000000 -> 0x000000a0
>     0: 0x00000100 -> 0x00000366
>     0: 0x000003a9 -> 0x00010000
> Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- you can enable it with "lapic"
> Allocating PCI resources starting at 20000000 (gap: 10000000:f0000000)
> PERCPU: Allocating 32180 bytes of per cpu data
> Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 64861
> Kernel command line: root=/dev/xvda1 ro console=hvc
> Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
> Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
> Initializing CPU#0
> PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 10, 4096 bytes)
> Detected 1600.003 MHz processor.
> Console: colour dummy device 80x25
> console [tty0] enabled
> console [hvc0] enabled
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
> Memory: 256076k/262144k available (1505k kernel code, 5272k reserved,
> 495k data, 232k init, 0k highmem)
> virtual kernel memory layout:
>     fixmap  : 0xf574f000 - 0xf57fd000   ( 696 kB)
>     pkmap   : 0xf5200000 - 0xf5400000   (2048 kB)
>     vmalloc : 0xd0800000 - 0xf51fe000   ( 585 MB)
>     lowmem  : 0xc0000000 - 0xd0000000   ( 256 MB)
>       .init : 0xc02fb000 - 0xc0335000   ( 232 kB)
>       .data : 0xc027840f - 0xc02f4218   ( 495 kB)
>       .text : 0xc0100000 - 0xc027840f   (1505 kB)
> Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok.
> 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G        W 2.6.27-rc1-xenU #4
>  [<c0103afa>] xen_mc_flush+0x12a/0x190
>  [<c0104a3d>] xen_set_pud_hyper+0x8d/0x90
>  [<c0115965>] zap_low_mappings+0x55/0x80
>  [<c02fbcb4>] start_kernel+0x1d4/0x2a0
>  [<c02fb670>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1f0
>  [<c02ff16a>] xen_start_kernel+0x58a/0x650
>  =======================
>   call  1/1: op=1 arg=[c1203860] result=-22
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:104!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>   

Keir, this looks like another instance of the "Xen won't allow guest to
update level 3" bug, though in this case it's 32-on-32.

Carl, are there any messages on the Xen console when this happens ("xm
dmesg")?

This looks like the same bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459067

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>