Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/13] Handle terminating signals.

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony Liguori writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/13] Handle 
> terminating signals."):
>   
> Then the pipe already has something in it which is fine.  The purpose
> of writing to it is to make sure that it is not empty.  We don't count
> the bytes.
>   
BTW, I don't see your patch yet, but my mail is pretty funky right now.

Then you need a pipe per-signal and you can't accurately simulate 
threadfd() (since you can't communicate siginfo).
> Please consider my patch instead, which doesn't depend on threads and
> is a lot smaller.
>   
I don't see threads as a problem.  Are you concerned about mini-OS?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Ian.
>   
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel