|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] merge some xen bits into
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Well, maybe having a version of the patch that does not convert the code
> into the qemu identation would help a lot for on-list review.
Hmm, dunno how to do that best, git-format-patch seems to lack an
equivalent of "diff -b" ...
> Also, would it be possible to just have the backend core and
> console+framebuffer patches alone? I don't see why we would need to
> change xen_machine_pv.c at all.
To stay closer to upstream? Upstream xen_machine_pv.c will in the
future also have some bits to handle xen emulation which will never be
actually used when running on the xen hypervisor. You don't really need
that. But I think using the same source code it is a good idea
nevertheless, it will be less maintainance work long-term.
> That being said, I guess we should wait for a pull in the qemu-xen tree.
I'd prefer to not have a patch backlog with tons of unmerged stuff ...
cheers,
Gerd
--
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|