WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][TOOLS] ioemu: linking fix for *BSD

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][TOOLS] ioemu: linking fix for *BSD
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:07:29 +0200
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:08:50 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200808151354.47451.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200808141059.20930.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> <18596.1276.176033.225169@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200808151354.47451.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7
On Friday 15 August 2008 13:54:47 Christoph Egger wrote:
> On Thursday 14 August 2008 12:12:12 Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Christoph Egger writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][TOOLS] ioemu: linking
> > fix
>
> for *BSD"):
> > > On Thursday 14 August 2008 11:58:38 Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > There doesn't seem to be anything BSD specific here.
> > >
> > > Right. It's the "ELF way". See my other mail. Sounds like you got a
> > > sort of "culture shock". :)
> >
> > Err.  I'm from a Debian and Linux background, which has been doing ELF
> > for approximately forever.  Did you read the two links Daniel Berrange
> > posted ?
>
> Yes. It is about finding different libc in different places. They claim
> there's a potential problem w/o clearly stating it.
> rpath allows you to explicitely specify which libc you want to use
> at runtime.
>
> > Your proposed patch would cause, on most ordinary builds, an -rpath to
> > be supplied pointing at the system directories /usr/lib{,64}.  This
> > would be wrong.
>
> hmm... right. It should do anything in system dirs.

err. I meant "It should NOT do anything in system dirs".
When I think faster than I type, whole words get "lost". :)

> The patch needs to be redone. Maybe using a variable which is
> empty on Linux ?
>
> Christoph


-- 
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center

Legal Information:
AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift):
   Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Deutschland
Registergericht Dresden: HRA 4896
vertretungsberechtigter Komplementär:
   AMD Saxony LLC (Sitz Wilmington, Delaware, USA)
Geschäftsführer der AMD Saxony LLC:
   Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel