 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] ROOT_DEV setup in Xen kernel
| To: | "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] ROOT_DEV setup in Xen kernel |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:39:51 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:39:21 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
With x86-64 not having followed i386 in the way ROOT_DEV gets set up I'm wondering how relevant the use of UNNAMED_MAJOR (going back to c/s 3751) still is. If it indeed still has a value, x86-64 should probably be adjusted. Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: large system support - 128 CPUs, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix shadow code's handling of p2m superpage changes, Tim Deegan |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xentrace - Patchset with xentrace changes & improvements, Trolle Selander |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix shadow code's handling of p2m superpage changes, Tim Deegan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
