WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] ROOT_DEV setup in Xen kernel

To: "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] ROOT_DEV setup in Xen kernel
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:39:51 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:39:21 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
With x86-64 not having followed i386 in the way ROOT_DEV gets set up
I'm wondering how relevant the use of UNNAMED_MAJOR (going back to
c/s 3751) still is. If it indeed still has a value, x86-64 should probably
be adjusted.

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] ROOT_DEV setup in Xen kernel, Jan Beulich <=