|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: large system support - 128 CPUs
At 14:41 -0400 on 12 Aug (1218552070), Bill Burns wrote:
> First is a build assertion due to the size of
> the page_info structure and the shadow_page_info
> structures get out of sync due to the presence
> of cpumask_t in the page info structure.
>
> A possible fix is to tack on the following to
> the end of shadow_page_info structure:
Yep, that'll sort it out fine. I don't think the #if is even needed
because a cpumask is always at least the size of a long. Or you could
add a "cpumask_t _unused;" to the union with mbz in it since that's
where the sizes get out of sync.
Cheers,
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Citrix Systems (R&D) Ltd.
[Company #02300071, SL9 0DZ, UK.]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: large system support - 128 CPUs, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: large system support - 128 CPUs,
Tim Deegan <=
|
|
|
|
|