|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions
On 12/8/08 17:33, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> That seems reasonable. In this use-case, it's quite likely that if the
>>> poll is interrupted by event delivery, on return it will find that the
>>> spinlock is now free and never re-enter the poll.
>>>
>>
>> Attached is a new version of the patch which clears the vcpu from poll_mask
>> when it is unblocked for any reason. Jan: please can you give this one a
>> spin if you get time.
>>
>
> Forgot to attach?
Sorry, attached now.
-- Keir
poll2.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|
|
|