|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> >> What guarantee are you providing? Per thread, per address space, or global
> >> monotonicity?
> >
> > Per thread non-strict monotonicity.
>
> Doesn't this just require thread-local storage and no lock?
The above is what we guarantee but it's not how it's implemented. All of
that is based upon the per-CPU hrtime, so we need the lock (or a
wholesale rework of how hrtime is managed in the Solaris kernel: that's
not going to happen :)
regards
john
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, John Levon
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, Nils Nieuwejaar
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW!,
John Levon <=
|
|
|
|
|