 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
| To: | Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ? |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:45:24 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ward Vandewege <ward@xxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:45:51 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080811015608.GA24345@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Acj7hjaVdQlRZWd5Ed25mQAWy6hiGQ== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ? |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 |
On 11/8/08 02:56, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It'd be nice to have kexec add that flag by default for Xen, or steal a new >> multiboot flag to mean the same thing, as this trips people up frequently I >> expect. Oh well, hopefully knowledge of this trick will spread. > > How robust is adding no-real-mode to the command line of the second > kernel? It probably makes sense just to have kexec add it by default. > But I am a bit reluctant to do so if it isn't always wanted. Any Xen version which recognises the option ought to have it specified when kexec'ed. It's not usually valid to drop back into real mode and execute legacy BIOS services at that time. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] svm.c:83:d917 Bad instructionlength 0, Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-ia64-devel] xend: Better support for legacy HVM config of ia64, KUWAMURA Shin'ya |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?, Simon Horman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?, Simon Horman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
