WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qe

To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:10:12 +0200
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:10:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080806154713.GQ4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080805154140.GV4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48997981.1030703@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080806102338.GA4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m37iauxqii.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080806125055.GG4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4899AD19.8060606@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080806140132.GL4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4899B06F.2090101@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080806142526.GN4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4899C4CB.2020105@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080806154713.GQ4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 17:35:39 +0200, a écrit :
>>> AGAIN, THERE IS THE IAN JACKSON TREE.
>>>
>>> Thanks for reading.
>> I get build failures when patching THE IAN JACKSON TREE due to THE IAN
>> JACKSON TREE lagging behind upstream.
> 
> You didn't mention that. "lagging" a few months indeed, while merging
> stuff.  And because xen 4.0 is about to be released, but it will
> probably catch up soon.

Well, for 4.0.x you probably have to branch off anyway, so the release
shouldn't stop catching up with upstream.

> Anyway that's not a reason for not using it, I
> guess the build failures can be fixed more easily than redoing Ian's
> work.

I'm using upstream qemu for development, and I'm not going to change that.

I can adapt the patches for the xen tree.  Having the xen tree *not*
lagging behind would be *very* helpful for keeping the trees and patches
in sync.

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>