WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu

To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:18:51 +0200
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:19:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080806133903.GH4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <48973F8E.8080109@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080805104630.GM4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <489835A3.6030804@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080805112935.GO4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48985336.2020709@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080805150328.GT4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080805154140.GV4478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48997981.1030703@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080806102338.GA4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4899A617.6040506@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080806133903.GH4448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 15:24:39 +0200, a écrit :
>>> You forgot the _test_ stage.  You are basically asking us to replace our
>>> well-tested implementation with your implementation, that's quite a
>>> move.
>> Sure, and more will follow.
> 
> But by having it merged into just upstream qemu you won't magically get
> Xen people actually test it, so it would be mostly dead code.
> 
>> Pretty much like upstreaming the xen support into the linux kernel.
> 
> There's a big difference here.  The upstream linux kernel merge won't be
> merged back to the linux-2.6.18 tree.

Oh, we can also arrange things without merging back.  Stop rebasing
qemu-dm (pretty much like 2.6.18), additionally hook upstream qemu as-is
into testing (like pv_ops kernels).  Then start submitting patches to
qemu.  When done, zap old qemu-dm.

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>