| 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A	BUGOR...
 
Hello, Thanks for the information. I'm trying to forward a PCI express SATA/PATA controller with a JMicron chipset. ( Info here.) I know there have been problems with graphics cards in general, but I thought it was possible with disk controllers? Is there a list of well supported hardware (disk controllers) that can be used for VT-d?
 Also, your RMRR explanation makes sense for the mercurial 3.2-testing, but what about xen-unstable? I didn't see any errors there besides "I/O Virtualisation disabled" with no other reason listed. 
Thanks so much for your help on this. I will also try removing the disk controller and see if the mercurial Xen-3.2-testing boots without RMRR errors. Regards, -Bryan On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Han, Weidong  <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
Hi Bryan, 
  
I think you are using an add-on graphic card (iGfx 
disabled), right? We also met this issue before. Obviously it's a BIOS issue 
(RMRR is incorrect). When parsing apci dmar failed, VT-d will 
be disabled. 
  
Randy (Weidong) 
Hello, 
I'm also seeing this exact same problem. I've posted on xen-users, but did 
not get an answer. Venkat seems to be experiencing the same problem as me. I 
have the latest BIOS for my motherboard DQ35JO. (BIOS ver 933) I'm running a 
Q6600 as well. It hangs at "Brought up 4 CPUs." I've tried all sorts of 
combinations of Xen versions and kernels to get this working. And, yes, VT and 
VT-d are enabled in my BIOS.
  
1) CentOS 5.2 SRPMS compiled with Xen 3.2.1. 
Adding pci=nommconf does not get it to boot.
  
2) Mercurial Xen-3.2-testing. Here, after adding pci=nommconf, I get: 
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:441: RMRR is incorrect. (XEN) Failed to parse ACPI 
DMAR.  Disabling VT-d. (XEN) [VT-D]ACPI DMAR:No DMAR devices found 
3) Mercurial Xen-unstable, I get "I/O Virtualisation disabled" I can't find 
any reason why this is the case. VT-D is not enabled. 
I would really like to find the cause for this. I don't know if this is a 
BIOS bug or what. This board is supposedly supported on Xen per the VT-D wiki. 
Other people seem to have the same problem as me: 
http://forums12.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/bizsupport/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1217898320366+28353475&threadId=1234588 
Thanks for any and all help, 
-Bryan
    
The BIOS version I use may be not the exact one as yours. I mean I expect 
you're not using a very old BIOS. :-)  
How about trying the xen 3.2.2-rc2 and the latest xen-unstable first? There 
are some VT-d bug fixes between 3.2.1 (you're using it) and 3.2.2-rc2. 
 
Thanks,  
-- Dexuan  
________________________________  
From: Kumar, Venkat [mailto:Venkat.Kumar@xxxxxxx] Sent: 
2008年8月5日 14:37 To: Cui, Dexuan; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A 
BUG OR...)  
If you don't mind can you send me the BIOS version you are using?  
Thx,  
Venkat  
================================  
Venkata Kumar Duvvuru,  
LSI Engenio,  
Adv. Development,  
Bangalore.  
Mob: +91-9880318542  
Off : +91-80-41978700 ( Extn : 3544 )  
================================   
________________________________  
From: Cui, Dexuan [mailto:dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 
Tuesday, August 05, 2008 12:03 PM To: Kumar, Venkat; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A 
BUG OR...)  
Hi Venkat,  
Can you confirm you're using the latest BIOS? Can you try the xen 3.2.2-rc2 
and the latest xen-unstable on the same host?  
I have the similar host. Xen 3.2.2-rc2 and the latest xen-unstable both 
work well on it.  
Thanks,  
-- Dexuan  
________________________________  
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Kumar, Venkat Sent: 2008年8月5日 12:21 To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A BUG 
OR...)  
After building Xen-3.2.1 I could successfully boot into it if I avoid 
giving vtd=1 as the boot parameter.  
If I pass vtd=1 as the boot parameter to xen, the system hangs while booting. 
 
The system hangs after the following messages  
============================  
Boot messages  
[XEN]…..  
[Xen] Brought up 2 CPUs...  
=========================  
My chipset DQ35 series is having VT-d support and is enabled in the 
BIOS as well.  
My domain0 is CentOS-5.2(2.6.18.8-xen).  
Is this a possible bug or some thing else??  
Any Idea??  
Thx,  
        
  
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A BUG	OR...), Bryan York
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A	BUGOR...), Han, Weidong
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A	BUGOR...),
Bryan York <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A	BUGOR...), Cui, Dexuan
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S A	BUGOR...), Kumar, Venkat
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER IT'S	ABUGOR...), Han, Weidong
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER	IT'SABUGOR...), Han, Weidong
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER	IT'SABUGOR...), Kumar, Venkat
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER	IT'SABUGOR...), Cui, Dexuan
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER	IT'SABUGOR...), Kumar, Venkat
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER	IT'SABUGOR...), Cui, Dexuan
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-3.2.1 VT-d Support (NOT SURE WHETHER	IT'SABUGOR...), Kumar, Venkat
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |