Samuel Thibault, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 16:41:40 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 16:03:28 +0100, a écrit :
> > Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 15:18:46 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Then it'd probably be good to push that upstream Xen.
> > >
> > > I'm cross-posting the patches to xen-devel for a reason.
> >
> > Well, cross-posting qemu patches to xen-devel is not the same as posting
> > xen patches to xen-devel...
>
> Just to explain a bit more, now that I have read the patches a bit:
And to be even more explicit, by "I have read the patches", I mean: I
have applied them to upstream qemu, them vimdiffed the files there with
the ones from Ian's tree (sometimes with different names), in order
to have an idea of what the merge would be (i.e. the "xen patches" I
mentioned above, which is what we care about from the point of view of
xen-unstable).
Samuel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home