WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Possible overflow in netbk_get_requests()

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Possible overflow in netbk_get_requests()
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:48:34 +1000
Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:48:58 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Hi,

I'm wondering if the call to netbk_get_requests() in
net_tx_action() might cause an overflow in the case where
there are more fragments than available slots in tx_map_ops (aka mop).

-- 
Horms


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>