WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH0/2]Move xen-pm options from dom0 cmdline to start

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH0/2]Move xen-pm options from dom0 cmdline to start info
From: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:53:26 +0800
Cc:
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:53:55 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4B33900.1B998%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <094BCE01AFBE9646AF220B0B3F367AAB035235BC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C4B33900.1B998%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcjwfOPFadHHbTEwRJKwuPBDdiJ0aAABYx95AABeu5AAALJD0wAACKEQ
Thread-topic: [PATCH0/2]Move xen-pm options from dom0 cmdline to start info
Yes, that is what I mean. Updated patch will come soon.

Jimmy

On Monday, July 28, 2008 3:51 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Reserve yourself some space with appropriate SIF_PM_MASK (or whatever)
> definition.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> On 28/7/08 08:40, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Can I reserve the second byte of this flag field for pm-option usage?
>> 
>> Jimmy
>> 
>> On Monday, July 28, 2008 3:21 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> On 28/7/08 07:40, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> One further thing to be mentioned is that this patchset enlarged
the
>>>> start info size. The alternative solution may be reusing the
existing
>>>> flag field, but I am not sure whether it is suitable. Any comments?
>>> 
>>> Just make it a new SIF_ flag. You can't safely extend the structure
without
>>> adding a flag to indicate you have done so anyway.
>>> 
>>>  -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel