WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: s_time going backwards on same processor?

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: s_time going backwards on same processor?
From: "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:47:11 -0600
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Winchell <dwinchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:50:31 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4AC96EA.1B691%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
Reply-to: "dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcjsRiBvfsM2jSzrTdKQFwbDzvcjiQATHBz4AItzXLA=
OK, I am definitely recording stime going backwards
observed with the attached patch.  I have recorded dozens
over a few hours.  It appears to have no
obvious pattern between reports, but one thing
is consistent: In all cases, t->tsc_scale.shift
is -1.  I'll try to run some more tests over the
weekend (e.g. with different clocksources... this
is with clocksource=hpet), but thought I'd report
what I have seen.  I'm running on a dual-core single
socket ("Conroe").

Dan

P.S. If you try the patch, ensure you set
the boot parameter "measurestime".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:06 AM
> To: dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx; Xen-Devel (E-mail)
> Cc: Dave Winchell
> Subject: Re: s_time going backwards on same processor?
> 
> 
> On 22/7/08 22:58, "Dan Magenheimer" 
> <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I *do* know that get_s_time() on different processors
> > can have this behavior and I know it is possible for
> > hvm_get_guest_time() to go backwards (timer_mode=0),
> > but I thought s_time was monotonically non-decreasing
> > on any given processor and that read_platform_stime()
> > is also monotonically non-decreasing.
> >
> > Does dom0 maybe have direct hardware access to the hardware
> > platform timer that xen system time is dependent on?
> 
> No matter what happens to the underlying platform timer, it should be
> impossible for Xen system time to go backwards on any given 
> processor. The
> calibration function never sets the TSC and system timestamps 
> for the next
> time record any earlier than current TSC value and current 
> computed system
> time value. Hence it should be impossible for system time to 
> be computed as
> earlier than that time record.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 
>

Attachment: checkbackwards.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel