WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [P

To: "dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time))
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:32:25 +0100
Cc: Dave Winchell <dwinchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:32:52 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080719115130390.00000001344@djm-pc>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcjcXTkqnSPaEESHRsmD1HhwJkyawAAAIPEpAAuAJ0AAAgl0IAAT2dqMABFKNxAAAHEqUAAGNaGwAAdfXjQAIb9HAAAAjWJ4AAico9AAAPZ0lAECdtJAABGXRyYAHMJkcAAXKn0wAaR9gGAAUpgMiQ==
Thread-topic: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time))
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122


On 19/7/08 18:51, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Would you expect system load to impact stime skew between
> processors (using hpet as a system timer)?  I can repeatably
> watch skew get worse when I am launching an hvm domain.  It is
> MUCH worse when the new domain is in its early stages of booting.
> CPU load on domain0 has little or no impact but I/O load
> on dom0 seems to make skew get worse.

Perhaps it makes a difference if it takes each CPU a bit longer to execute
the calibration function in softirq context? That could be delayed by long
hypercalls, for example (although long hypercalls should mostly be
preemptible).

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>