WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu

Ignoring the fact that `git pull' in the `ioemu-remote' directory did nothing, 
just said:

Already up-to-date.

--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
Ph: (303)443-3786 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>Dugger, Donald D
>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:16 PM
>To: Jean Guyader
>Cc: Li, Haicheng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Samuel Thibault
>Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu
>
>So the top level makefile does a `git pull' if the 
>`ioemu-remote' directory doesn't exist but it doesn't do the 
>pull if it does?  That seems a little inconsistent.
>
>Also, I thought the purpose of `make distclean' was to remove 
>everything that wasn't part of the tree, especially given that 
>it will remove the Linux kernel subtree shouldn't it also 
>remove the `ioemu-remote' directory?
>
>--
>Don Dugger
>"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
>Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
>Ph: (303)443-3786 
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jean Guyader [mailto:jean.guyader@xxxxxxxxx] 
>>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:59 PM
>>To: Dugger, Donald D
>>Cc: Samuel Thibault; Li, Haicheng; 
>>xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu
>>
>>You should do a git pull inside ioemu-remote.
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Dugger, Donald D
>><donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I'll let Haicheng comment on the I/O request, that's really 
>>his bug not mine.
>>>
>>> in re: GCC v. 4 - I just did a `hg pull' (changeset: 
>>18074:23208dc42cfe), `make distclean && make' and got the same 
>>error, it still requires GCC v. 3.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Don Dugger
>>> "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
>>> Donald.D.Dugger@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Ph: (303)443-3786
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>>>Samuel Thibault
>>>>Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 2:40 PM
>>>>To: Dugger, Donald D
>>>>Cc: Li, Haicheng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>>ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Problems with the new ioemu
>>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>Which version are you using?  Some of the errors you are reporting
>>>>should have been fixed by now:
>>>>
>>>>Dugger, Donald D, le Thu 17 Jul 2008 13:34:48 -0700, a écrit :
>>>>> I/O request not ready: 0, ptr: 0, port: 0, data: 0, count: 
>>0, size: 0
>>>>> (qemu) Failed allocation for dom 18: 2048 extents of order 0
>>>>> Failed to populate physmap
>>>>
>>>>Should be fixed
>>>>
>>>>> Issue4: cannot compile with GCC v. 4, `make' fails with:
>>>>> WARNING: "gcc" looks like gcc 4.x
>>>>> Looking for gcc 3.x
>>>>> gcc 3.x not found!
>>>>
>>>>Should be fixed.
>>>>
>>>>Samuel
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>Jean Guyader
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>