|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc
> Changeset 18055 is what I had in mind. I split out the
> read_counter-is-64-bit portion separately. The changeset
> needs a bit of
> testing and it may need a tweak or two.
Hmmm... One thing I was trying to do with the special
casing in get_s_time() was to avoid using a dynamically
changing scaling (t->tsc_scale). If I'm not mistaken,
t->tsc_scale is recalculated every EPOCH and thus is
a potential source of stime jitter. Seems unnecessary
just to make the code look cleaner.
One other nit: Especially if the above is changed, do
you really prefer a strcmp vs a global variable (or
checking for size == 64) for determining if the tsc
is the platform timer?
Thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc,
Dan Magenheimer <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] clocksource=tsc, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|