WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.9.10 of GPL PV Drivers for Win

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.9.10 of GPL PV Drivers for Windows / jumbo frames and xen netback changes
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:16:27 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:17:12 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0148FAEC@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcjQdtp2GP4D7DxqEd2vHgAX8io7RQD4RMhQAABfBZ4=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.9.10 of GPL PV Drivers for Windows / jumbo frames and xen netback changes
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
On 22/6/08 12:08, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> So long as you advertise feature-sg in xenstore then netback will allow
>> the
>> mtu to be increased to jumbo sizes. This doesn't happen automatically --
>> the
>> user will need to increase mtu both in the vif inside the guest and on the
>> vif exposed in dom0. But apart from that it will work!
>> 
> 
> Well then it may actually 'just work' in the windows drivers. The MTU is
> settable in the normal way for a windows network driver (although I've never
> tested it). If you do test it please let me know the outcome.
> 
> Keir: Have you ever considered having the back end publish its MTU to the
> frontend, so the two can be kept in sync?

Should the backend control the frontend in this respect, or vice versa?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>