xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][kdb] Implement dbg_rw_hvm_mem

from [Mukesh Rathor]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Ben Guthro <bguthro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][kdb] Implement dbg_rw_hvm_mem
From:	Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:14:49 -0700
Cc:	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:15:28 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<48459B45.2030609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization:	Oracle Corp
References:	<48459B45.2030609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719)

Ben Guthro wrote:
> The following patch does 2 things:
> - Correct a bug confusing XEN_SUBVERSION with XEN_VERSION - preventing
> kdb working on xen 3.2

Actually, there's no confusion. The api's are different in 3.1.x and
3.3. Looks like 3.2 is same as 3.3. I'm downloading 3.2 and will change
appropriately.

> - Implement dbg_rw_hvm_mem for Xen 3.X hypervisors
ok,  thanks.

BTW, you must refresh your kdb with a BUG fix i made in kdbmain.c/kdbmain()
regarding disabling irqs in ss mode.

Thanks
Mukesh

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH][kdb] Implement dbg_rw_hvm_mem, Ben Guthro [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][kdb] Implement dbg_rw_hvm_mem, Mukesh Rathor <=

Previous by Date:	[Xen-devel] dom0 boot failure with 256G, Mukesh Rathor
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] dom0 boot failure with 256G, Ian Pratt
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH][kdb] Implement dbg_rw_hvm_mem, Ben Guthro
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Building guests on monotonic Xen system time, Dan Magenheimer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]