| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: One question for CPUID for PV guest
Got it. Thanks for your clarification.
-- Yunhong Jiang
Keir Fraser <mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We'd have to keep a default policy at least for dom0 hardcoded in Xen.
>
> -- Xen
>
> On 28/5/08 08:52, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> So how about dom0? Does that mean we need different handler for
dom0/PV
>> guest in emulate_forced_invalid_op()?
>>
>> -- Yunhong Jiang
>>
>>
>> Keir Fraser <mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> There's no reason not to make PV CPUID similarly configurable.
>>>
>>> -- Keir
>>>
>>> On 28/5/08 08:19, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Keir/Jean, I have one question for changeset 17524 "Guest CPUID
>>>> configuration" (The URL is
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/18727843db60).
>>>> This changeset do CPUID caculation in libxc. My question is, why
don't
>>>> we have such support for PV guest? Currently PV guest's CPUID
>>>> virtualization is hardcoded in emulate_forced_invalid_op(), is it
>>>> possible to do things like hvm domain?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Yunhong Jiang
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home