WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table

To: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:44:53 +0100
Cc: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:45:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B30DA1341B0CFA4893EF8A36B40B5C5D02930D73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcikU/U3pfCdxRGgQWKd/PxtMk6F9AABbOHmAAAZSpAAAJq3BAADN6LwAAGQyzAAAMGNwAAAJK0NAAbwDTAABGeXIw==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
On 22/4/08 16:43, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Then don't allow EPT 2MB mappings for domains which have
>> passthru devices?
>> 
> 
> EPT 2M page is already supported while VT-d 2M not, so for we have to
> seperate the 2 guys if we want to use 2M page in EPT.
> and of course we share the page tables if both sides use 4K pages.

Just share the tables and put up with not having 2MB mappings available to
you if a guest has devices passed through to it? Doesn't sound so bad to me,
and you can get the performance back down the line by fixing the VT-d
hardware to understand superpage mappings. We're going to end up with a
silly number of p2m structures otherwise.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel