xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time()
Is the issue that there is a variable delay in waiting to acquire the
platform_timer_lock? If so, you can fix that by, for example, making
read_platform_stime() the *first* thing you do inside the
local_irq_disable/enable() block in local-time_calibration(). i.e., *before*
doing the rdtsc() and get_s_time(). This avoids a variable delay between the
TSC-based time estimates and the platform-timer-based time estimate.
If that fixes your issue I'll apply that in preference.
-- Keir
On 21/4/08 23:55, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What's the race? All accesses to platform time are already done under the
> platform_timer_lock as far as I can see.
>
> -- Keir
>
> On 21/4/08 21:32, "Dave Winchell" <dwinchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Keir,
>>
>> In my work on layering hpet on get_s_time, I found a problem
>> in get_s_time and related code. Because of the problem I was getting
>> large jumps in the offset between local time and ntp time.
>> These jumps were on the order of many seconds.
>>
>> The issue is the race between local_time_calibration() executing
>> on one processor and platform_time_calibration() on another.
>>
>> I have included a patch which addresses the race in
>> local_time_calibration(), cpu_frequency_change(), and
>> init_percpu_time().
>>
>> I'm giving you this ahead of the hpet work as it affects all users
>> of get_s_time().
>>
>> I'm confident of the fix in local_time_calibration() as I had failures there
>> before the fix and no failures after. The other two I'm less confident
>> in, so check
>> my work closely there.
>>
>> On the hpet over get_s_time() front, this fix allows me to get .0014% error.
>> This is very close to the error going to the hardware hpet each time.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> diff -r a38a41de0800 xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c Wed Apr 16 16:42:47 2008 +0100
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c Mon Apr 21 15:19:37 2008 -0400
>> @@ -530,6 +530,16 @@ static s_time_t read_platform_stime(void
>>
>> return stime;
>> }
>> +static s_time_t read_platform_stime_locked(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 count;
>> + s_time_t stime;
>> +
>> + count = plt_count64 + ((plt_src.read_counter() - plt_count) & plt_mask);
>> + stime = __read_platform_stime(count);
>> +
>> + return stime;
>> +}
>>
>> static void platform_time_calibration(void)
>> {
>> @@ -749,6 +759,7 @@ int cpu_frequency_change(u64 freq)
>> {
>> struct cpu_time *t = &this_cpu(cpu_time);
>> u64 curr_tsc;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>>
>> /* Sanity check: CPU frequency allegedly dropping below 1MHz? */
>> if ( freq < 1000000u )
>> @@ -758,15 +769,15 @@ int cpu_frequency_change(u64 freq)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - local_irq_disable();
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&platform_timer_lock, flags);
>> rdtscll(curr_tsc);
>> t->local_tsc_stamp = curr_tsc;
>> - t->stime_master_stamp = read_platform_stime();
>> + t->stime_master_stamp = read_platform_stime_locked();
>> /* TSC-extrapolated time may be bogus after frequency change. */
>> /*t->stime_local_stamp = get_s_time();*/
>> t->stime_local_stamp = t->stime_master_stamp;
>> set_time_scale(&t->tsc_scale, freq);
>> - local_irq_enable();
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&platform_timer_lock, flags);
>>
>> /* A full epoch should pass before we check for deviation. */
>> set_timer(&t->calibration_timer, NOW() + EPOCH);
>> @@ -830,16 +841,18 @@ static void local_time_calibration(void
>> /* The overall calibration scale multiplier. */
>> u32 calibration_mul_frac;
>>
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> prev_tsc = t->local_tsc_stamp;
>> prev_local_stime = t->stime_local_stamp;
>> prev_master_stime = t->stime_master_stamp;
>>
>> /* Disable IRQs to get 'instantaneous' current timestamps. */
>> - local_irq_disable();
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&platform_timer_lock, flags);
>> rdtscll(curr_tsc);
>> curr_local_stime = get_s_time();
>> - curr_master_stime = read_platform_stime();
>> - local_irq_enable();
>> + curr_master_stime = read_platform_stime_locked();
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&platform_timer_lock, flags);
>>
>> #if 0
>> printk("PRE%d: tsc=%"PRIu64" stime=%"PRIu64" master=%"PRIu64"\n",
>> @@ -944,10 +957,10 @@ void init_percpu_time(void)
>> unsigned long flags;
>> s_time_t now;
>>
>> - local_irq_save(flags);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&platform_timer_lock, flags);
>> rdtscll(t->local_tsc_stamp);
>> - now = !plt_src.read_counter ? 0 : read_platform_stime();
>> - local_irq_restore(flags);
>> + now = !plt_src.read_counter ? 0 : read_platform_stime_locked();
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&platform_timer_lock, flags);
>>
>> t->stime_master_stamp = now;
>> t->stime_local_stamp = now;
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, (continued)
Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Keir Fraser
- Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Keir Fraser
- RE: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Dave Winchell
- Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Keir Fraser
- RE: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(),
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
|
|
|