|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Use PATH_MAX for pathname char arrays.
If there are better alternatives I'd be happy to use them instead. But we
already use PATH_MAX elsewhere in the tools, so this might be a
wider-ranging cleanup than you think. The original impetus for this change
was due to bugchecks applied in some cases by glibc's realpath()
implementation. But actually is realpath() deprecated anyway?
-- Keir
On 4/4/08 15:17, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using PATH_MAX is not a good idea: POSIX says that that definition
> is facultative, in case the system does not impose any limit on path
> length. Some systems may also set PATH_MAX to a quite high value, and
> we would hence consume a lot of stack.
>
> Samuel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|