Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_MORE

To:	Andrew Grover <andy.grover@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_MORE
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:33:18 +0000
Delivery-date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:34:39 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<47EA930E.4040003@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AciPb9xJGwG/APtjEdy8ZQAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_MORE
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122

On 26/3/08 18:16, "Andrew Grover" <andy.grover@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  * This is the 'wire' format for packets:
>  *  Request 1: netif_tx_request -- NETTXF_* (any flags)
>  * [Request 2: netif_tx_extra]  (only if request 1 has NETTXF_extra_info)
>  * [Request 3: netif_tx_extra]  (only if request 2 has XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_MORE)
>  *  Request 4: netif_tx_request -- NETTXF_more_data
>  *  Request 5: netif_tx_request -- NETTXF_more_data
>  *  ...
>  *  Request N: netif_tx_request -- 0
> 
> Is XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_MORE gone? I don't see it mentioned anywhere else.

It's actually XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_FLAG_MORE.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_MORE