|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: changeset 17265
No, I’m not 100% sure, but without this change I get a backtrace in xend.log because append() takes only one argument. Looking at the line immediately above I determined that this was most likely the correct change to make, and that the previous placement of the square bracket was a typo.
-- Keir
On 24/3/08 15:21, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Keir,
I just saw the changeset 17265. Are you sure that this is correct?
--- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendConfig.py Thu Mar 20 10:48:21 2008 +0000
+++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendConfig.py Thu Mar 20 17:45:00 2008 +0000
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ class XendConfig(dict):
dev_type, dev_cfg = self['devices'][dev_uuid]
is_bootable = dev_cfg.get('bootable', 0)
config.append(['bootable', int(is_bootable)])
- config.append(['VDI'], dev_cfg.get('VDI', ''))
+ config.append(['VDI', dev_cfg.get('VDI', '')])
sxpr.append(['device', config])
I get a line in the VM's config file that looks like this
(VDI )
It's missing the UUID now.
Even though the format was different than of the 'bootable' above, I did get the correct output with it,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|