WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] VMX nightly testing for Xen:#17269 is blocked

To: "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX nightly testing for Xen:#17269 is blocked
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:24:50 +0000
Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:25:58 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4092E17.153FE%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciLHKK5mOkWUlYXRGeF1WZt36A73AAGAGAmAAAxU7o=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] VMX nightly testing for Xen:#17269 is blocked
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
Actually your ttyS0 logging is also interesting. MMIO emulation is failing
on an instruction with prefix "0f 6f", which is MOVQ. It's not clear,
though, whether MOVQ is *really* supposed to be emulated -- I don't think
the old MMIO emulator emulated MOVQ either, so this may indicate that
execution went wrong sometime earlier.

 -- Keir

On 21/3/08 09:19, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Interesting. I managed to install a Windows XP guest, but it took *ages* (at
> least twice as long as usual, and actually probably more than that).
> 
> The changeset referenced in the bug ticket might well be a red herring.
> Probably it is best to binary-chop on the Linux boot failure to find the
> offending changeset for that.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> On 21/3/08 06:27, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Since 76 changesets are added to Xen-unsable tree today (c/s 17194 ~ c/s
>> 17269), regression is introduced accordingly.
>> 
>> Today's nightly testing for Xen:#17269 is blocked by following issue:
>> 
>> Bug #1194, both Linux and Windows HVM guest can not boot up,
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1194.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- haicheng
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel