WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 3.2 and later compatibility issue

To: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 3.2 and later compatibility issue
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:21:36 +0000
Cc: joe.bonasera@xxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:08:51 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080311180546.GD6536@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciDpL2q/Fogx++XEdy2vwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] 3.2 and later compatibility issue
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
On 11/3/08 18:05, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "Strictly speaking we're not changing Xen's heap mappings. The issue
> is that we are creating new mappings to Xen heap pages that have
> not full caching attributes. Intel says that all mappings to a given
> page should use the same caching attributes. It appears that Xen
> is now enforcing that with a check."
> 
> This is a fairly nasty compatibility issue, but then, Solaris is "wrong"
> in trying to add the mappings as they are. Is there a sensible way to
> fix this breakage in Xen?

Xen could silently re-set the PAT flags in the PTE, rather than fail the PTE
update completely. I'm fearful that just stores up trouble for future
though, by reducing bug visibility. Also the guest may not like having its
PTEs mangled in this way. And, since this is a workaround for old guests,
we'd have to make this distasteful behaviour the default!

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>