WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Disable Xen PowerNow! support on Opteron2nd gen

To: "Xavian-Anderson Macpherson" <Shingoshi@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Disable Xen PowerNow! support on Opteron2nd gen and earlier processors
From: "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:41:03 -0000
Cc: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:41:32 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <479A713B.5040507@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C3C01FB1.12D87%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <479A713B.5040507@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Achfql2WC7M6aQkqTw6/xWH3h+zv4wAAVcFw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Disable Xen PowerNow! support on Opteron2nd gen and earlier processors
> Are we in fact talking about the new Barcelona chips? If so, their
> frequency settings are independent per core. Unless I have
> misunderstood the question.

That shouldn't be an issue either way.

Ian

 
> Shingoshi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
>       On 25/1/08 22:58, "Mark Langsdorf" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>
> <mailto:mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>               I tried this suggestion and also implemented the trace
> function in
>               cpu_frequency_change() and local_time_calibration() you
> suggested in
>               a previous message.
> 
>               It made no discernable difference in my tests.  I did
high
> to low
>               and low to high changes roughly every five minutes, and
> always got
>               an excessive difference inside of Xen and usually got
error
> messages
>               in Linux.
> 
> 
> 
>       It's a bit confusing as to what is going on since there are 4
> CPUs in the
>       system. Are arbitrary or all CPUs changing frequency, or just
one
> of them?
>       Is the single-step PSTATE_CTRL MSR being used, or the multi-step
> FID_VID
>       method where voltage adjustments are under software control?
What
> is the
>       system's CPU topology, and do any of the cores have their
> frequency controls
>       tied together?
> 
>       It'd be useful to have each tracing line stamped with the CPU
> that it comes
>       from. As it is the tracing looks very suspect because the
> systimes on
>       adjacent lines are much less than one second, and calibration is
> supposed to
>       happen no more than once per second.
> 
>        -- Keir
> 
> 
> 
>       _______________________________________________
>       Xen-devel mailing list
>       Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>       http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>