On Wednesday 23 January 2008 15:33:20 Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 23/1/08 14:25, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Can I get some feedback from the people-who-make-decisions if a patch
> >> changing all 'unsigned long's in the public .h files to uintptr_t's
> >> would be accepted? If not, what type should I use?
> >
> > Shouldn't it be changed appropriately? That is, uintptr_t for values
> > that actually do, or can, hold a "pointer" value, and something else for
> > other 'longs'?
>
> We could just call it xen_long or xen_ulong. That would hide the underlying
> uintptr_t, which is needed anyway for XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION backward
> source-level compatibility.
When that ends up for uintptr_t being "unsigned long long" on 64bit platforms
and "unsigned long" on 32bit platforms, then you did it in a portable way.
BTW: C99 also defines intptr_t for whatever that might be useful.
Christoph
--
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center
Legal Information:
AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift):
Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Deutschland
Registergericht Dresden: HRA 4896
vertretungsberechtigter Komplementär:
AMD Saxony LLC (Sitz Wilmington, Delaware, USA)
Geschäftsführer der AMD Saxony LLC:
Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home