|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/x86: avoid casting hypercall arguments to
On 21/1/08 15:18, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - : "1" ((long)(a1)) \
> + : "1" ((a1)?:0) \
Most of the patch seems to be placing this construct all over the place.
What's it for? How is x?:0 different from x?
> + register typeof((a4)?:0) __arg4 asm("r10") = (a4); \
> + register typeof((a5)?:0) __arg5 asm("r8") = (a5); \
> + "=d" (__ign3), "+r" (__arg4), "+r" (__arg5) \
Is it guaranteed that gcc will keep the register variables in their assigned
registers across the inline asm?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|