| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: linux c/s 391
On 21/1/08 09:59, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The comment in the first hunk of that patch contradicts the added code:
> mdelay() is a busy wait loop, i.e. CPU consumption is getting worse. Is it
> possible that msleep() or msleep_interruptible() was meant to be used
> here?
Yes.
> Additionally, since blktap was derived from blkback, shouldn't a similar
> change bo done there?
Yes.
-- Keir
> Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home