WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] netfront leaking two pages on unload?

To: Andy Grover <andy.grover@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] netfront leaking two pages on unload?
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:48:45 +0000
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:50:24 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1200518188.2845.78.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AchZIHEEr98K28UTEdyOuwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] netfront leaking two pages on unload?
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
On 16/1/08 21:16, "Andy Grover" <andy.grover@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Should it instead be:
> 
> case XenbusStateClosed:
> if (xenbus_dev_is_online(dev)) {
> struct backend_info *be = dev->dev.driver_data;
> netif_disconnect(be->netif);
> break;
> }
> xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed);
> /* fall through if not online */
> 
> ?
> 
> Otherwise the pages cannot be freed properly in the guest, right?

Well, I think you've chosen slightly the wrong place, so I've just committed
a change that makes the close-down logic more like in blkback. Possibly the
reason we didn't follow that same logic before is that netif_disconnect()
also makes the network device in dom0 also go away, which might cause
unwanted chnages to routing and firewall rules, execution of hotplug
scripts, etc. But we can separate the concepts of relinquishing frontend
resources and destroying the backend netdev later if it turns out to be
necessary.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>