|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak...
On 15/1/08 13:42, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It depends on your test case. If you save/restore the same VM repeatedly
>> then in the old case you would see no leak. But youw ould still see a leak
>> if you created/destroyed lots of different VMs.
>
> I don't think so - domain destruction already removes the /vm path (I'd
> confused myself here). I just verified this with our 3.1 bits.
We could officially make /vm/ have the same lifetime as /local/domain, in
which case it should die even on domain localhost migration, or we could
take the patch that Jim suggests, and revert the other two. I don't have a
particularly strong opinion either way.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak...,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Jim Fehlig
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] That xenstored console leak..., Jim Fehlig
|
|
|
|
|