xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] XML format, multiple VM's

from [Stefan de Konink]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] XML format, multiple VM's
From:	Stefan de Konink <skinkie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:04:35 +0100
Delivery-date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:04:58 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071225)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,


- From DTD perspective it seems perfectly viable to store multiple VM's in
one xm.xml file. Now I wonder the xenapi create doesn't have a specific
'name', it will create all vm's in the file.

Wouldn't it be more easy if one could specify an XML document with a
name, and only this documents (with only the required VDI's) are created?


Yours Sincerely,

Stefan de Konink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHi2vzYH1+F2Rqwn0RCiRWAJwPLuPJhaTk/p2R0h6w/GtXz3kwWACfQNs+
q1QGv8XHNSPYukn2GFePssk=
=sY9Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] XML format, multiple VM's, Stefan de Konink <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] Fix guest hang producing "PIT: bad access"messages, Christoph Egger
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] Fifth (final?) release candidate for 3.2.0, Marco Sinhoreli
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] VMX status report for Xen-3.2.0 RC6. Xen: #16710 & Xen0: #376 -- no new issue., Li, Haicheng
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] unstable changeset 16667 introduced regression, Bruce Rogers
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]