Re: [Xen-devel] Duplicate __HYPERVISOR_grant_table_op in hvm_hypercall32_table?

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The assignment of do_grant_table_op() is bogus. I’ll remove it.

 Thanks,
 Keir


On 13/12/07 10:23, "Paul Samon" <paul.samon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c:
> #define HYPERCALL(x)                                        \
>     [ __HYPERVISOR_ ## x ] = (hvm_hypercall_t *) do_ ## x
>  
> #if defined(__i386__)
>  
> static hvm_hypercall_t *hvm_hypercall32_table[NR_hypercalls] = {
>     HYPERCALL(memory_op),
>     [ __HYPERVISOR_grant_table_op ] = (hvm_hypercall_t *)hvm_grant_table_op,
>     HYPERCALL(xen_version), 
>     HYPERCALL(grant_table_op),
>     HYPERCALL(event_channel_op),
>     HYPERCALL(sched_op),
>     HYPERCALL(hvm_op)
> };
>  
> #else /* defined(__x86_64__) */
> -------------------
> For the index __HYPERVISOR_grant_table_op, there are 2 assignments -- do_grant_table_op(), and hvm_grant_table_op() here???
> What's the purpose by doing so?




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel