WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Page tables in Xen

hi
I am still confused about the shadow page table in the live migration procession, in this procession, xen shadow page table copy each process's page table in guestOS ,is it right? what formular is it used ,is it something in the form of page talbe with 3 or 4 levels, or is it just an array like p2m table ,or something? and what does it deal with? if it is only for detecting which page entry is modified ,does it need a whole copy of each process's page table in xen ,could an extended p2m table be competent?

I am not very quite clear about the functions of shadow page talbe in PV mode for live migration ,I have read the live migration paper that during the migration ,WWS should be detected and some mechanism should be used if necessary, but could these be delt with using an extended p2m talbe ,rather than a whole copy of the gurstOS process's page tables? or there are some tricks behind these obviously inefficient usage of memory,

another confusion is the auto_translated_physmap or PV/autotranslated mode , does it also need a whole shadow page table copy in xen? what is form of the page table of this ,are these array or something of 3or 4level page table,and what is the function ?



Thanks in advance




Mark Williamson 写道:
  I am confused about shadow page table in the paravirtual mode in xen,
  does guestOS have all of its own processes'page tables,and  xen keeps
the very exactly all of the guestOS's processes page tables for a copy?
or say ,it is xen  who keeps the only copy of the guestOS's processes
page tables ,and guestOS  accesses to its processes's page tables
through some hypercall? or ,what about it ?
  If the guestOS has all of its processes's page talbes, while xen
maintain the copy of all those page tables ,is it an inefficient usage
of memory ,or what is the trick behind ?


The process owns all of the pagetables for its processes; Xen does not (in normal operation) maintain a shadow pagetable for PV domains.

In PV mode, Xen simply prevents a guest from loading a pagetable for use unless the guest has relinquished all rights to write to that memory. i.e. a guest can only register a pagetable with Xen if there's no way that the guest can modify that pagetable directly. This guarantees safety.

When the guest needs to update the pagetable, it can either write directly to it (which will cause a trap due to lack of permission, then Xen will check whether the update should be allowed) or it can call directly to Xen (which then does safety checks and does the update if it's OK).

Cheers,
Mark

Thanks in advance

Daniel Stodden 写道:
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 11:00 +0530, pradeep singh rautela wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 1:42 AM, Haifeng He <hehaifeng2nd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for answering my question. I am talking about PV mode. What
about shadow page table? Does it mean, Xen will keep (real) copies of
page tables?
Shadown page tables are employed in HVM guests not PV guests.
regarding shadowed PV domains, there's still
XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap. but it's rather exotic and therefore
rarely used.

regarding the original question: yes, this means xen keeps the real page
tables, while guests map pseudo-physical (i.e. linear) memory in what
they (may) believe to be the real ones.

regards,
daniel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel