|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] about parallex fs
> I have read the paper about parallex FS in xen , and I am interested in
> it ,but I notice that parallex FS which is in the tree for earlier
> version ,has been dropped out in the later version, what is the reason
> for dropping it out, in my opinion,it is an interesting and promising
> technech,is it ? or are there some disadvantages in it ,or are there
> some even more interesting substituent tech for it?
> I am confused about it ,could someone give me some exeplaination
I don't think the parallax in the mainline tree was ever developed very
heavily; it seems likely that the version written up in the paper was based
on a modified source tree.
But the code went unmaintained for some time and was presumably removed from
the source tree due to it getting old and not working properly... I agree it
seemed like a really interesting technology and it's a shame not to see more
done with it. I get the impression that most enterprises are using NAS/SAN
solutions already, so perhaps there wasn't sufficient demand for Parallax as
a competing solution...
Cheers,
Mark
--
Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat? And no pedals!
Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
Mark: My wheel has a wheel!
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] about parallex fs,
Mark Williamson <=
|
|
|
|
|