| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with 3.1.2?
All the checks happen in scripts under tools/examples in the repository, and
there have been almost no changes to any files in that directory in the 3.1
branch since 3.1.0. There have been no changes to the block hotplug scripts
at all.
-- Keir
On 25/11/07 09:11, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmmm... I actually remember querying why I could do consecutive 'xm
> block-attach' operations on a device without any warning being given,
> but I can't find the original email. I guess someone fixed it in
> response to that but didn't allow the '!' to override it.
>
> James
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2007 20:10
>> To: James Harper; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with
>> 3.1.2?
>>
>> The behaviour isn't supposed to have changed. If it has between 3.1.1
> and
>> 3.1.2 then it should be easy to track down as there aren't that many
>> changesets.
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>> On 25/11/07 01:31, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>>> 'xm block-attach' doesn't let me assign the same backend device
> anymore,
>>> even if I use 'r!' or 'w!'.
>>>
>>> I think this has changed since 3.1.1 (or maybe since 3.1.0).
>>>
>>> Is this the way it is supposed to work?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home