WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] hvm-stub for ia64

To: tgingold@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] hvm-stub for ia64
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:53:59 +0000
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:54:38 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1195725624.47455338d0e37@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tgingold@xxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <C36B0021.18DB5%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1195725624.47455338d0e37@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
tgingold@xxxxxxx, le Thu 22 Nov 2007 11:00:24 +0100, a écrit :
> Quoting Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > On 22/11/07 09:31, "tgingold@xxxxxxx" <tgingold@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Presumably the old HVM builder for ia64 becomes dead code though? So really
> > this is the 'new' hvm building path. Do you need to support the old way (on
> > ia64) if this is checked in?
> Yes, I don't plan to remove the old way on ia64.  I have not implemented
> a VGA in the stub firmware and I don't plan to do it soon.

That's the main difference between your approach (reimplement a
firmware) and the approach being developped here at XenSource (embed
qemu in a tiny stubdomain).  Your VMX work in Xen is most probably
something useful, but reimplementing the hardware emulation support of
qemu looks to me like duplicate work.  I haven't ported my stubdomain to
ia64 yet, but that shouldn't be very hard now that it works for x86.

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel