Re: [Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP

To:	John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:37:04 +0000
Delivery-date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:38:02 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20071122091114.GA19487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acgs85843bgHUJjmEdybPwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

It should be masked off. Now fixed.

 -- Keir

On 22/11/07 09:11, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Is there a particular reason why this isn't masked off in cpuid for SVM,
> as it's not (and probably shouldn't be) handled?
> 
> cheers,
> john
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP, John Levon Re: [Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP, Keir Fraser <= Re: [Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP, John Levon Re: [Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP, Keir Fraser

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP