|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem
Venkataraman, Meenakshi wrote:
What versions of Xen and oprofile are you running?
I'm running xen 3.1.0 and oprofile 0.9.3 (patched for xen).
Any oprofile related message in the kernel log or in the output of "xm
dmesg"
No...none. Although the cpu type is correctly recognized as a xeon in xm
dmesg.
What is on /dev/oprofile/cpu_type after you run opcontrol?
"i386/piii"
Also take a look at /var/lib/oprofile/samples/oprofiled.log for any
error message
There are a lot of CPU_SWITCH messages in during some runs in the
oprofiled.log. I saw another post with the same problem on an embedded
processor, but couldn't find any follow up to it.
Meenakshi
Is xen 3.1.0 okay to run with oprofile 0.9.3. There were some conflicts in the
defines between xenoprof and the defines added for the cell processor in
oprofile 0.9.3.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250852
-Will
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Venkataraman, Meenakshi
- RE: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Santos, Jose Renato G
- RE: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Venkataraman, Meenakshi
- RE: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Santos, Jose Renato G
- RE: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Venkataraman, Meenakshi
- RE: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Santos, Jose Renato G
- Re: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem,
William Cohen <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Santos, Jose Renato G
- Re: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, William Cohen
- RE: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Santos, Jose Renato G
- Re: [Xen-devel] Revisiting the Xenoprof problem, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|