WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1.2 + 2.6.23.8 == traps.c:403:d0 Unhandled invalid

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.1.2 + 2.6.23.8 == traps.c:403:d0 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] in domain 0 on VCPU 0 [ec=0000]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:11:01 -0800
Cc: xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:17 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C3689E39.18A85%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C3689E39.18A85%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
Keir Fraser wrote:
> Two compounded problems. Firstly, the 2.6.23 Xen support only works as domU,
> not as dom0. Secondly, because the dom0 domain builder inside Xen sets a
> 'magic' string in start_info as 'xen-3.1-...' rather than 'xen-3.0-...' as
> the user-space domain builder does, the 2.6.23 kernel BUG_ON()s very very
> early when run as dom0.
>
> I've cc'ed Jeremy as I believe the BUG_ON() should simply be got rid of (or
> at least should perhaps only check for the 'xen-' prefix).

Fair enough.  I was wondering what it actually means: is it just a
hypervisor version string, or is it a hypervisor ABI signature?  Could I
reasonably check for "xen-3", or will Xen 4.x put something else there?

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel