|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Xend transaction reduction breaks migration
On 15/11/07 18:39, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Any idea how your patch could cause this rather bizarre behaviour? I haven't
>> worked it out myself, though I'm 99% sure it *is* that changeset that has
>> caused this regression (based on tests with the changeset reverted).
>
> Basically, instead of doing many small transactions, my change made some stuff
> all happen in one large transaction. Oddly though, I tried to be careful so
> that I only changed the codepath for the 'xm list' operation (well the SEXPR
> call to the list operation). Other operations like create, save, restore
> ought to be left using fine grained transactions as before.
I'll have another look at nearby changesets in xen-unstable then. Yours
doesn't really look all that likely to cause this problem, except that the
empirical evidence does point at it.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|